Short Answer
First, fix bullets that do not show an action, connect key skills to specific work or projects, and check dates, contacts, and section names. Add metrics only when the candidate can verify them. For ATS, prefer a simple text-based structure without important information trapped in images.
1. Turn a responsibility list into a clear action
A noun-heavy list tells the topic of the work, but it makes the recruiter reconstruct what the candidate actually did.
Before
API testing, test case writing, bug reporting in Jira.
After
Tested APIs, wrote test cases, and documented reproducible defects in Jira.
The edit adds an action and a cleaner structure. It does not add new tools, numbers, or outcomes.
2. Check skills that are not supported by experience
A separate skills list helps scanning, but a long stack without context is less convincing. If Skills lists SQL, Postman, and Selenium, while experience only supports SQL and Postman, the service should not invent Selenium experience.
Clarifying question
Where did you use Selenium: which company or project, and for what tasks?
The user can answer, remove the unsupported skill, or skip the question.
3. Make the structure easy for ATS to parse
ATS review does not predict an employer decision. It helps verify that important resume data can be read as normal text.
- Name, contact method, and target role are stored as text.
- Sections use clear names: Summary, Skills, Experience, Education.
- Each job has a role, company or project context, and readable dates.
- Experience is ordered from most recent to older roles.
- The document does not contain broken, duplicated, or corrupted fragments.
What should not be added automatically
Do not invent the number of test cases, coverage percentage, release count, time savings, or use of a technology. If the data is missing, a good edit improves clarity and turns the missing fact into a question for the user.
Analysis Summary
A good QA resume does not need a number in every bullet. Its job is to quickly show specialization, supported tools, clear actions, and real outcomes where those outcomes are known. Evaluate how the experience is presented, not how many employers are listed.
Entry-level QA resume example